Blog
How to Convert Hourly Pay to an Annual Salary (and Back)
Multiplying by 2,080 is the quick version and it is wrong more often than it is right. Here is how to convert pay rates in a way that survives unpaid leave, part-time hours and contract work.
The standard conversion multiplies the hourly rate by hours worked per week and then by 52. At 40 hours a week that is 2,080 hours a year. The figure is a reasonable starting point for salaried full-time work with paid leave, and it overstates income for almost everyone else.
The basic conversions
A 28 hourly rate at 40 hours for 52 weeks is 28 x 2,080 = 58,240. Going the other way, a 65,000 salary over 2,080 hours is 31.25 an hour.
Both conversions use the same figure for weeks worked, and that figure is where the accuracy lives.
Annual = Hourly rate x Hours per week x Weeks worked per year Hourly = Annual salary / (Hours per week x Weeks worked per year) Standard full-time assumption: 40 x 52 = 2,080 hours
Adjusting for unpaid leave
If your leave is unpaid, you are not paid for 52 weeks. Subtract the weeks you take off.
At 28 an hour, 40 hours a week, with four weeks unpaid leave: 28 x 40 x 48 = 53,760. That is 4,480 below the naive figure — roughly 8% — and the gap is invisible if you only ever quote the hourly rate.
Unpaid public holidays work the same way. Ten unpaid holidays is 80 hours, or 2,240 at that rate.
This is the single most common reason a converted figure comes out too high, and it applies to a large share of hourly roles.
Common working patterns
The same hourly rate produces annual figures from 26,000 to 52,000 depending only on the pattern. This is why an hourly rate on its own is not comparable to a salary, and why job listings that quote one against the other are hard to read.
| Pattern | Paid hours per year | Annual at 25/hour |
|---|---|---|
| 40 hrs/week, paid leave | 2,080 | 52,000 |
| 40 hrs/week, 4 weeks unpaid | 1,920 | 48,000 |
| 37.5 hrs/week, paid leave | 1,950 | 48,750 |
| 30 hrs/week, paid leave | 1,560 | 39,000 |
| 20 hrs/week, paid leave | 1,040 | 26,000 |
| 40 hrs/week, 9 months only | 1,560 | 39,000 |
Converting a salary to an hourly rate for comparison
Going the other direction is useful when deciding whether a salaried role is worth more or less than hourly work you already do.
A 62,000 salary at a contracted 37.5 hours is 62,000 / 1,950 = 31.79 an hour. But if the role routinely involves 45 hours, the real rate is 62,000 / 2,340 = 26.50.
That difference — over 5 an hour — is the entire argument for converting on actual hours rather than contracted ones. Salaried roles absorb extra hours without extra pay, and the conversion is the only way to see the effect.
Contract and freelance rates need a bigger adjustment
A contractor's hourly rate is not comparable to an employee's hourly rate at the same number, because the contractor pays for things an employer would otherwise cover.
Start from billable hours, not worked hours. Most independent workers bill between 60% and 75% of their working time once quoting, admin, invoicing and business development are accounted for. At 40 working hours a week, that is roughly 24 to 30 billable.
Then add the costs an employer would carry: unpaid leave and sick days, self-employment taxes and contributions, insurance, equipment, software, and any pension you fund yourself. These commonly add 25% to 40% on top of the equivalent salary.
The practical version: to match a 55,000 salaried package, a contractor at 1,400 billable hours a year and 30% additional costs needs roughly (55,000 x 1.30) / 1,400 = 51 an hour, not the 26 that a naive 2,080-hour conversion suggests.
What the hourly-to-annual shortcut leaves out
- Using 2,080 hours when leave is unpaid. Subtract the unpaid weeks.
- Treating gross and net as interchangeable. Every figure here is before tax and deductions, which vary too much by location to generalise.
- Ignoring overtime rules. If part of the week is paid at a premium, calculate the base and premium hours separately.
- Converting a salaried role on contracted hours when the actual hours are consistently higher.
- Comparing a contract rate to a salary without adjusting for benefits, unbillable time and self-funded costs.
- Assuming a month is exactly four weeks. It averages 4.33, and using 4 understates annual pay by about 8%.
Assumptions and limitations
Every figure here is gross pay. Take-home depends on income tax, social contributions, pension deductions and local rules that differ enough between countries and regions that no single conversion can cover them. Use these figures to compare offers on a consistent basis, then check net pay against your own jurisdiction's rules.
The conversions also assume hours are stable. Seasonal work, variable shift patterns, on-call arrangements and commission-based pay all produce an annual figure that is a projection rather than a calculation. For variable hours, converting from the last twelve months of actual pay is more reliable than converting from a nominal rate.
And none of it captures non-cash value. Employer pension contributions, health cover, paid parental leave and job security are real compensation that does not appear in an hourly rate, which is why a contractor's higher headline rate is not straightforwardly better.
Convert working time before comparing rates
The hourly-to-annual shortcut assumes a particular number of paid hours and paid weeks. If a role includes unpaid leave, holidays, variable hours or bonuses, use the actual compensation and working-time assumptions instead. For freelance work, the calculation needs another adjustment because not every working hour is billable.
Frequently asked questions
Why is 2,080 the standard number?
It is 40 hours multiplied by 52 weeks. It assumes full-time hours every week of the year with leave paid, which makes it a convenient default rather than an accurate one for most hourly roles.
How do I convert a monthly salary to hourly?
Multiply the monthly figure by 12 to get the annual amount, then divide by annual hours. Do not divide by four weeks — a month averages 4.33 weeks.
Should I use gross or net when comparing offers?
Compare gross first, since it is the figure both employers quote. Then check net for the roles you are seriously considering, because deductions can differ between employment types even at the same gross pay.
What multiplier should a freelancer apply to a salary?
There is no universal number. Build it from your own billable ratio and your actual business costs rather than applying a rule of thumb, since both vary widely by field and location.
How many hours are normally used for an annual salary estimate?
A common shortcut is 40 hours per week for 52 weeks, or 2,080 hours, but actual paid hours can differ substantially.
Can I compare a freelance hourly rate with a salaried hourly rate directly?
Not fairly without adjusting for benefits, unpaid time, taxes, business expenses, leave and non-billable work.
Conclusion
The conversion itself is a multiplication. The accuracy comes from the hours figure you put into it: subtract unpaid leave, use actual hours rather than contracted ones when they differ, and for independent work start from billable hours and add the costs an employer would otherwise absorb. Applied consistently to both sides, the arithmetic makes two offers comparable that otherwise are not.
Figures in this article are illustrative. Results depend on your own rates, fees, taxes and circumstances, and are for educational and planning purposes rather than financial advice.